Arctic Mining Consultants Essay

This particular case looks into how Arctic Mining Consultants crew did non effectively do their job in Eagle Lake, Alaska. gobbler Parker is a geological line of products technician and subject coordinator for the company. He acted as the check manager on the job near Eagle Lake, Alaska. His crew of field assistants consisted of John Talbot, Greg Boyce, and Brian Millar. Tom had worked with all three field assistants to begin with.Tom has specialized skills in claim staking, melodic line cutting and grid installation, soil sampling, prospecting, and trenching. This particular job involved skating 15 claims, which consist of marking a line with flagging tape and blazes along the perimeter of the claim. A claim post is cut e very(prenominal) 500 yards, meaning 60 miles in line total. Tom hoped to complete the job in a week, and offered the field assistants each a $300 bonus if it was completed in era. This would be added to their fairly low daily wages. As the job progressed, a ccent was thick because the deadline was approaching.The field assistants were working long days, and cardinal of them were continually not beting Toms expectations. Tom particularly took his frustrations out on Millar. tombst one and only(a) Issues The field assistants are given little motivation to work hard. They are paid fairly low daily wages and are putting in long days. Tom Parker does not offer verifying encouragement either, yelling and making the field assistants feel bad could make them care less to the highest degree the job. The field assistants are provided meals and accommodations, just now even Tom admitted that a lot was expected of them in a short amount of time.Tom Parker is not a good leader. He is the one who does the hiring, training and supervising for all of Arctic Mining Consultants programs. It could be possible he is not properly training field assistants to thoroughly meet his expectations. Tom Parker, on more then one occasion, exploded with anger . He did not coach his team up, he just yelled at them. If he was supervising there work on Day 3, he should have communicated with the field assistants and told them how to improve their work then. On Day 6, when the field assistants did verbalise improvement, Parker did not give them any positive reinforcements.Also, even after Paker picked on only Millar for bad performance, he asked him to work for him again. The field assistants seem to have very variant capabilities and attitudes. Boyce did not get picked on by Parker, but admitted to Millar that he only worked as hard as he had to. Boyce had the worst results of everyone. Talbot met his quota and stayed to help Boyce meet his. He was a team player. Millar put in more time and effort, by being the first one dropped off Day 6 and 7, uttermost one picked up Day 6 and 7, and not taking lunch Day 5. He worked himself so hard, that he collapsed at dinner, to tired to eat.Define the trouble The key problem in this case is that Tom Parker is not a good leader. He is in charge of hiring, training, and supervising field assistants. Couldnt the field assistants work be reflected on Tom because he did not properly train them? Also, Tom selected the field assistants for this job. He should have known what they were capable of before selecting them. He had worked with al of them before, so he should have had reasonable expectations for each of them. Tom also made a hostile working environment with a good deal stress and little positivity.Alternative Solutions Solution 1 Tom needs to be retained as a project manager. Being a project manager means being a leader. Tom is not a good leader. An effective leader is one who leads by encouraging the employees and making them penury to succeed, thereby making the organization meet and exceed its goals over time. (Thakur, 2005). Tom did not handle fight well he took his frustrations out on one particular field assistant. Relational leadership is one form of effective l eadership. Relational leadership centers around person-to-person relationships.One of the significant components of all relationships is how conflict is handled. (Ferch & Mitchell, 2011). The advantage of retaining Tom to gain leadership skills would be that Tom potentially could more effectively train field assistants and make a better team dynamic. The disadvantage is that Arctic Mining Consultants would have to spend time and money to re train the trainer, Tom. It would be beneficial for him to develop new leadership skills, but it might be difficult not having a project manager. Solution 2 Tom and Arctic Mining Consultants should offer more incentives to his field assistants.It doesnt even have to be monetary. Offering positive reinforcement for work well done would be beneficial to Tom and his team. While money is weighty to employees, what tends to motivate them to perform and to perform at higher levels is the thoughtful, personal kind of recognition that signifies true ap preciation for a job well done. (Eastern, 2012). The advantage of this firmness would be that employees would feel better about the work they are doing, and feel good hen they excel. Field assistants would be working in a positive environment.The disadvantage would be employees would start to expect positive reinforcements and bonuses, feeling they are entitled to it. Solution 2 Hire new field assistants. Tom could more carefully select his field assistants for a job. He should do more research on candidates capabilities and experience if he has high expectations. The advantage of having a different team of field assistants would be that he could filter out those who do not meet expectations before hand. The negative side of hiring new field assistants is the time it would take to evaluate new candidates as field assistants.Selected Solution I believe the first solution would bee best to solve this case. Tom needs to evaluate his leadership tactics. He does not communicate effecti vely with his crew. He needs to think of the crew working together like a team, and he is coach. Tom is not being effective by focusing on the negatives he needs to analyze what is being done wrong, and coach field assistants to correct their problem. executing/Recommendations First, Arctic Mining Consultant should have Tom trains another potential project manager that already works for the company.The candidate should undergo some symbol of leadership training. Then Tom will engage in a leadership-training program. The candidate will be the project manager while Tom is absent. Then, the two project managers, Tom and candidate, will work as a team to direct field assistants. Tom needs a new outlook on his management style. Implementing this plan will help achieve that. This will also help make more effective work teams.